27 November 2008, 18:44

Armenia's GPP dissatisfied with Hammarberg's statements

Agvan Ovsepyan, General Public Prosecutor (GPP) of Armenia, has expressed severe criticism of the statements made by Thomas Hammarberg, Supreme Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, about the course of investigation and court decisions made in relation to the events of March 1.

According to the message of the press service of the Prosecutor's Office of Armenia, during his meeting with Silvia Zeikhe, Special Representative of the Council of Europe in Armenia, Agvan Ovsepyan expressed his bewilderment by the fact that the Supreme Commissioner could do his conclusions, while being unfamiliar with the materials of criminal cases. The GPP has also expressed his negative attitude to Mr Hammarberg's statement that Armenia should take advantage, for studying the circumstances of the death of the 10 casualties, of the services of international ballistic experts.

According to Agvan Ovsepyan, shortly after the events of March 1 the State Office of Public Prosecutor addressed with this sort of request to the United Nations, OSCE, US Embassy and personally to Mr Hammarberg asking to provide the help of Ballistic experts. However, the request was ignored.

We remind you that Thomas Hammarberg, Supreme Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, speaking at the press conference in Yerevan on November 22, when summing up his three-day visit to Armenia, said that no progress had been made in fulfilling the OSCE Resolutions. He expressed his dissatisfaction with the custody conditions of prisoners: "I'm disturbed by the fact that people are in custody for more than 8 months without presenting any clear proofs that they should respond for the events on March 1."

He has pointed to deficiencies in running the litigation. In particular, according to Thomas Hammarberg, there are cases when witnesses are exposed to pressure, as a result of which some witnesses refused to evidence.

Mr Hammarberg made special accent in his presentation on the so-called "Case of Seven", that is, the case of the organizers of March 1 events. The Supreme Commissioner has expressed his doubt of whether they generally had any desire to overthrow the power by force. "So far, I've seen nothing looking like an attempt to overthrow the existing power," he has stated.

Thomas Hammarberg has reported that he plans to thoroughly study all the materials of the case and the judicial opinion. "Should I find out that there are no sufficient evidences for transferring the case to the court, then we'll talk about the presence of political prisoners," he added.

Author: Lilit Ovanisyan, CK correspondent

All news
НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН И РАСПРОСТРАНЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ ООО “МЕМО”, ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА ООО “МЕМО”.

June 21, 2024 17:28

June 20, 2024 22:58

June 20, 2024 21:11

June 20, 2024 17:33

  • Termination of murder case against Umazhat Guseinova upheld

    The appellate instance has recognized as legal the decision of the court in Makhachkala to stop the criminal prosecution of Tagir Velagaev, a pensioner of the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MIA), accused of murdering his ex-wife Umazhat Guseinova. The human rights project "Travmpunkt", whose advocates represented the victim in court, has reported this in its Telegram channel.

June 19, 2024 22:55

  • Kuban resident fined for calls to terrorism

    A court in Rostov-on-Don has found Vladimir Yarotsky, a resident of the Krasnodar Territory (also known as Kuban by the name of the main river), guilty of calls for terrorism and imposed a fine of 350,000 roubles on him, the human rights project "OVD-Info"* has reported with reference to the press service of the court.

News archive