Ayup Gagiev. Photo: press service of Ingushetia leadership, http://www.ingushetia.ru/news/020033/

13 September 2019, 22:02

Ayup Gagiev argues against changes in borders between Chechnya and Ingushetia

On September 12, Ayup Gagiev, the chair of the Constitutional Court of Ingushetia, declared that the agreements with the authorities of the unrecognized Chechen Republic of Ichkeria, which served as the basis for the agreement on the changed administrative border signed by Ramzan Kadyrov and Yunus-Bek Evkurov, had no legal force.

The "Caucasian Knot" has reported that the agreement on the consolidation of the border between Chechnya and Ingushetia signed on September 26, 2018, provoked mass protests in Ingushetia. On October 30, the Constitutional Court of Ingushetia declared the Ingush law on the border with Chechnya unconstitutional. However, the Constitutional Court of Russia considered the same issue on December 6, 2018, recognized the legality of the agreement, and announced its immediate entry into force.

Ayup Gagiev, the chair of the Constitutional Court of Ingushetia, continued to criticize the legal justification of the border agreement with Chechnya. He returned to the issue on his Facebook page and gave a legal analysis of the agreements on the Chechen-Ingush border of 1993-1994, since the 2018 agreement was based on them.

The treaty "On the principles for determining the borders of the territory" of July 23, 1993, and the Agreement on the revision of the state border between the Chechen Republic-Ichkeria and the Republic of Ingushetia of March 29, 1994, concluded by Ruslan Aushev, President of Ingushetia, with the leaders of Ichkeria, "initially did not and could not have any legal force, but were purely political in nature," believes Ayup Gagiev. He explained that such agreements could be concluded only with the participation of the federal centre, and Ichkeria itself was an unrecognized republic. On the Chechen side, the agreement was signed by the person illegitimate from the point of view of the Russian laws, and in their essence, those documents contradict the Russian laws, Ayup Gagiev emphasizes.

This article was originally published on the Russian page of 24/7 Internet agency ‘Caucasian Knot’ on September 13, 2019 at 05:55 pm MSK. To access the full text of the article, click here.

Комментирование через Кавказский узел
All news
НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН И РАСПРОСТРАНЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ ООО “МЕМО”, ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА ООО “МЕМО”.

April 22, 2025 23:58

April 22, 2025 23:55

April 22, 2025 19:53

  • Kadyrov’s patronage does not help Bakalchuk keep “Wildberries” Company

    In Moscow, a court has considered a case on division of property and obliged Vladislav Bakalchuk to pay compensation to his former wife Tatiana Kim. Despite support from Chechnya, Vladislav Bakalchuk received only 1/7 of the total couple’s property, and his share in the “Wildberries” Company went to Tatiana Kim.

April 22, 2025 19:45

  • Defendants in two resonant cases in Rostov Region decide to go to SMO

    Three of the defendants in the case on the shootout between Chechen farmers in the Chernozubov farm yard have already left for the special military operation (SMO), and Anastasia Potorochina, a former psychiatrist of the Rostov tuberculosis hospital of the Russian Federal Penitentiary Service (known as FSIN) wrote a letter asking for permission to conclude a military contract.

April 21, 2025 23:55

  • More than 1000 people request ICRF to take control of Seda Suleimanova’s case

    Activists have sent 1011 appeals to the Investigating Committee of the Russian Federation (ICRF) with the demand to take control over the investigation into the Seda Suleimanova’s case. Signatures are being collected in Russian cities under an appeal to the country’s presidential administration in connection with the Seda Suleimanova’s disappearance in Chechnya.

News archive
Пн
Вт
Ср
Чт
Пт
Сб
Вс
31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
1
2
3
4